Friday, December 14, 2007
A Woman's choice is violated; why no outcry?
A man gave his pregnant girlfriend RU-486 in a drink to kill his unborn child. Read this story of a woman whose choice to carry her baby to term was thwarted. You won't hear it in the news.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Because the only choice that it's bad to thwart is the "choice" choice. If you thwart the "antichoice" choice you're not really thwarting a "choice" because she didn't really "choose", because if she had "exercised her right to choose" she'd have chosen "choice" in the first place.
Follow?
Gotcha, Granny, always the sage!
Post a Comment